Porteus

S4*:

Have you tried what I did propose in post 83?

Hum! You are right!

Thanks beny. So would you say that it has better possibilities than nemesis?

Hello neko. Is aporteus package manager is still working. I am trying to download and it seems that the download is corrupted. And is aporteus package manager runs on top of porteus 4.0 xfce4 desktop or do I have to use a completely different porteus installation.

The sbopkg has a real neat interface. It would be great if it could be installed over usm.

Under xfce4 use the panel menu. It is there under internet menu.

If someone has a working module of slpkg. It would be appreciated. My first try at it was a failure.

Thanks.

Download it aonce more. By the way what is theweight of the downloaded module?

Is this a new behavior of your porteus installation? Or has that been going on from the first time you used it? Try your installation without the changes option, and report. Changes folder often becomes corrupted or sometime some added module creates that type of bug.

As ncmprhnsbl commented, there is no reason that you linux box couldn't stand porteus.

And more pertinent:
https://forum.lxde.org/viewtopic.php?t=1484
run lxpanel command from lxterminal to show it

Please try the xfce4 desktop version, just to see if it works better. And report. This should help us to understand what is going on.

Thanks.

Just start zoom. And select join. As soon as the Taichi webinar will be started, you will be online in video conference. If you want to test it with me just send your email address. I will send you an invitation and you will see how it works. What kind do taichi do you practice: taichi tai or tai ch...

@rava:

Still, I am not sure I am following you. Can you summarize in a few sentences the facts?

As beny as proposed it slpkg. Contrarily to sbopkg, it should resolve dependencies. See: https://foro.seguridadwireless.net/colaboracion-y-desarrollo-de-nuestras-lives/slpkg-vs-slapt-src/ I know this is necrobumping, as soon as I get enough time and info, I will make a bis version of this old thread...